Liverpool Fc @ Anfield - Reds Supporters Gatherings

[Xgenre]

Originally Posted by totoman

Hen Tag rice bowl could get sack anytime soon ..... seriously he is doing a good job at Man U . Wish he can keep his rice bowl

Amazingly over the past week, there is research that says Man U is the 2nd best run club in the EPL after Spurs. The amount of money he spent as Man U manager doesn't affect their finances. Never qualify for Champions League also hardly affect them financially.

Our on field success can't help us to compete with them financially.

[escobar43535]

Thanks for the stuff on FFP and PSR bro

But my point actually relates to Cole Palmer's very high quality football skill ability at only 22yo and English as well

Why then would Pep & City want to sell such an extremely valuable long term asset like Palmer?

And surely Palmer is much more valuable than £40m?

Also not forgetting that Chelsea is a potential local rival

Clearly Chelsea got a very good bargain deal

Originally Posted by Xgenre

Due to financial fairplay rules, a team that sells a player can add the transfer fee in 1 financial year while a team that buys a player spreads the transfer fee over the course of the contract.

Means when Man City sells him, it's an immediate $40m profit in their accounts (he was a Man City academy graduate so considered $0 cost to the club.) Plus $40M into this financial year. Very useful for Financial Fair Play. Same reason why Man U sold academy graduates Mason Greenwood and Scott McTominay.

For Chelsea, the $40m cost is spread over the length of his contract. So if a 5 year contract is given, this $40m transfer will appear as a $8m cost over 5 financial years.

The actual term if you wish to google is (Profit and Sustainability Rules -PSR)

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/socc...043e191482250d